Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Mike WarfeBrian Melancon

MUSC

Leila Forney , Rechelle Paranal, Prathik Harikrishnan, Jillian Harvey

Case Western

Children’s National

Camilla Colvin, Hiroki Morizono

Iowa

De O’Quinn, Nic Francisco

LA CaTS

OHSU

Kitt Swartz, Imogen Bentley

Stony Brook

Melanie Keister, Rodrigo Valles

SPARC Interest/Demos

  • UNC NYU Demo (progressing to Admin/Fulfillment demo)

    • They are really interested in the Funding Module that Ying developedj

      • Stony Brook is interested in the funding module

        • Get Stony Brook in touch with Brian Melancon from LA CaTS

  • Mayo Clinic Demo (Interested in Nexus in our CTSA Clinical Research Unit (CRU))

  • Georgia CTSA Demo (SPARCRequest)

Operations Story Review Updates

...

...

  • Document functionality, improvements, version control discussion

    • Upcoming Features in next major release

    • Features for later releases

      • Archiving older documents (creating a button to archive)

        • Do you want research teams to be able to archive?

          • Develop some method of letting research teams understand how institutions want them to use the document feature

      • Coming up with a way for the research team to enter a description of the document they are uploading (Leila)

    • Feedback?

      • Have stack (grouping) versions of documents (Document Type)

        • rolling documents under document types (groups)

        • Melanie brought up OnCore Document type as an example

  • Demographics Collection (Stony Brook)

    • What would be the best process for collecting a user’s demographic information?

      • Get in contact with Brian from LA CaTS because they have a process for collecting demographic information

      • MUSC: we use single sign on, as well as information entered by the user

        • You could create a form to collect the information

  • Reports Discussion

    • All users reports

    • Get all of the reports the LA CaTS has created

  • Future api connection between SPARC and iLAB

    • Setup future meeting for further discussions (Stony Brook)

  • Next Meeting: Pull up metrics from other institutions who are using SPARC

Updates 

  • Oregon: Getting ready to release the newest version of SPARC (v3.9.2)

    • (Leila) How many service providers/services have been setup

      • 100-200 service types, 12 service providers

  • Stony Brook: Learn the system and test the functionalities in SPARC

    • Come up with test cases and scenarios

      • Anyone willing to share their institution’s test cases

  • Children’s National: No updates

Action Item

Notes

Steering Committee Involvement?