...
SPARCRequest Ops Review Stories – 370 (+0) & 289 accepted
SPARCFulfillment Ops Review Stories – 74 (+0) & 58 accepted
Current Stories under review:
Roadmap Review (ProductPlan)
SPARCRequest Version 3.10.0 & SPARCFulfillment Version 3.4.0
Currently working on stories for next release
Feedback?
Discussion topics
Introduce Brigette White from MUSC
She will take over a lot of work that Wenjun was doing
Brian Demographics Demo
Ying was able to make it so that Demographics is configurable
Review process Discussion
Stony Brooks: opportunity for teams to apply for rewards so they can submit a proposal for a project. We have a process/committee that review the proposal (feasibility committee, diversity & inclusion committee, etc).
Would be great if research teams could submit this proposal in SPARC and the committees could update where in the review process they are.
Not sure if SPARC is appropriate for this system or do we need to have them use a different system, then comeback to SPARC for completion
MUSC initiates funding opportunities in SPARC
Once they have a SPARC ID, they then use InfoReady to apply for those funding opportunities
We do the review in InfoReady because there is functionality available for that
We are planning to switch over to REDCap in the future
We do use some reviewing functionality in our research nexus
We might expand that functionality
LA CaTS developed the SPARCFunding Module to:
Used more for gathering the funding applications and from an administrative view, for determining that their biostats consultation occurred
From a review process
very similar to Stony Brooks
we pull the applications and a coordinator manages the review process
spreadsheet driven process
Updates
MUSC:
Setup a demo of how we use InfoReady for next meeting
Links opening mutliple tabs story Discussion for next meeting
Updating the Question when a User first adding services to SPARCRequest
We will bring back to the team for discussion next month
Stony Brooks:
OHSU:
Iowa: