Page Comparison

...

• SPARCRequest Ops Review Stories – 370 (+0) & 289 accepted

• SPARCFulfillment Ops Review Stories – 74 (+0) & 58 accepted

• Current Stories under review:

  • https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/181893059

  • https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/182491420

  • https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/182204348

  • https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/181758085

  • https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/181922142

Roadmap Review (ProductPlan)

• SPARCRequest Version 3.10.0 & SPARCFulfillment Version 3.4.0

  • Currently working on stories for next release

  • Feedback?

Discussion topics

Updates

...

Stony Brooks: Currently reaching out to service providers about what services they want on SPARC

...

OHSU: No updates

...

• Introduce Brigette White from MUSC

  • She will take over a lot of work that Wenjun was doing

• Brian Demographics Demo

  • Ying was able to make it so that Demographics is configurable

• Review process Discussion

  • Stony Brooks: opportunity for teams to apply for rewards so they can submit a proposal for a project. We have a process/committee that review the proposal (feasibility committee, diversity & inclusion committee, etc).

    • Would be great if research teams could submit this proposal in SPARC and the committees could update where in the review process they are.

    • Not sure if SPARC is appropriate for this system or do we need to have them use a different system, then comeback to SPARC for completion

  • MUSC initiates funding opportunities in SPARC

    • Once they have a SPARC ID, they then use InfoReady to apply for those funding opportunities

      • We do the review in InfoReady because there is functionality available for that

        • We are planning to switch over to REDCap in the future

    • We do use some reviewing functionality in our research nexus

      • We might expand that functionality

  • LA CaTS developed the SPARCFunding Module to:

    • Used more for gathering the funding applications and from an administrative view, for determining that their biostats consultation occurred

    • From a review process

      • very similar to Stony Brooks

        • we pull the applications and a coordinator manages the review process

        • spreadsheet driven process

Updates

• MUSC:

  • Setup a demo of how we use InfoReady for next meeting

  • Links opening mutliple tabs story Discussion for next meeting

  • Updating the Question when a User first adding services to SPARCRequest

    • We will bring back to the team for discussion next month

• Stony Brooks:

• OHSU:

• Iowa: