SPARCRequest Wiki

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

No contributors found for: authors on selected page(s)

SPARCRequest and OnCore Interface Information


A fully integrated interface between SPARCRequest and OnCore has been developed under the promotion of the Medical University of South Carolina. Roll-out with OnCore enterprise went live in September 2020.

The purpose of SPARCRequest having a minimum footprint Interface with OnCore (as shown in Figure 1):

  • Easier creation of research protocol and billing calendar outside Epic

  • Uniform research pricing and improved billing compliance

  • Reduce manual and duplicative data entry

  • Improve data consistency across systems

  • Comprehensive reporting

  • Enhance communication across providers

  • User/research provider management

Figure 1 Functionality and Overlap between SPARCRequest and Epic


Information pushed from SPARCRequest to OnCore comes from the Study Summary section (see Figure 2) and the study calendar section (see Figure 3) of SPARCRequest, which helps build the following pieces in OnCore :      

  • Research study administrative (RSH) record

  • Study timeline

  • Study staff

  • Funding source identification

  • Participant Privacy Protections

Figure 2

Figure 3


Specific terms in SPARCRequest that match with the ones in Epic are listed below.

SPARCRequest Terms

Epic Terms

Protocol Information

General Information

Protocol Title

Study Name (I RSH .2)

PRO # (IRB #)

IRB # (I RSH 105)

NCT#

NCT # (I RSH 181)

Protocol ID

Study Code(I RSH 100)




Reporting Groupers

Funding Source

Report Grouper - Category List 1 (I RSH 3001)

Study Type generated from SPARC Epic box

IDE, HUD, and HDE# (under Investigational Products)

Research Master ID (RMID)

Report Grouper - Category List 3 (I RSH 3011)

Report Grouper - Free-Text 2 (I RSH 3002)

Report Grouper -Free-Text 3 (I RSH 3003)

Role

Study Users (role_code) 

Primary PI

Principal Investigator (I RSH 130) (SER needed)

PI/PD; Co-Investigator; Staff Scientist; Postdoctoral scholar, Fellow, or other Postdoctoral Position; Technician

Other providers (I RSH 140) (SER needed)

Research Nurse

Nurses (I RSH 150) (SER needed)

Graduate Research Assistant; Undergraduate Research Assistant; Research Assistant/Coordinator; Billing/Business Manager

Study Coordinators (I RSH 110) (no SER needed; EMP only)

Faculty Collaborator; Consultant; Mentor; General Access User; Other

Research Contacts (I RSH 120) (no SER needed; EMP only)

Visit Calendar (Billing Information)

Study Calendar

ARM

Protocol (I PRL .2)

Visit

Visit (CYCLE) (I PRL 200)

Day

Day (CTTEVENT) (I PRL 400)

Window

Research tolerance (I PRL 470 [minus], I PRL 480 [plus])

Service

Component (I PRL 41005)

Research/Third Party Payer (R/T)

Modifier (I PRL 41007)

Epic Questions

STUDYTYPE

Answers to Epic Questions 1 to 5, Logic-driven

Study Type (I RSH115)

*Principal investigator, Other providers, and Nurses need to have the corresponding “provider’s record” if he/she has been selected to have EMR access.


Protocols (records) that are “Submitted” in SPARCRequest by users are sent to an Epic Queue in SPARCRequest;

If the Epic queue configuration is turned on, the protocols that  are interfaced to Epic are sent automatically in a batch mode on daily basis; If the Epic queue configuration is turned off, the protocols are queued and have to be pushed manually by system identified users.

Authorized users can view, send or delete the protocols in the SPARC/Epic queue with the functions described below.


OnCore Log Function (from SPARCDashboard)

  • In SPARCDashboard, authorized service providers are able to see the “Epic Queue” button (Figure 4), which will allow them to check what studies are in the process of being pushed to Epic.

Figure 4

OnCore Page

  • Once the user clicks the "OnCore Log" button, they are able to see the OnCore CRPC Push log for protocols that have been pushed to Epic Research .

  • Figure 5 shows the protocols that have both been Successfully and Unsuccessfully pushed, as well as the PI, Calendar Version, Last Push Date, and Push History


Figure 5



.


Technical Specs





  • No labels